2024/07/04

Gene duplication, Neofunctionalization or Subfunctionalization events don't result in Evolution

Gene Duplications don't lead to Evolution

Gene duplication is often heralded by proponents of evolution as a significant mechanism driving the increase in genetic diversity and complexity within organisms. However, when examined through the lens of intelligent design and recent scientific discoveries, several key points challenge this traditional evolutionary narrative.

Gene Duplications Are RNA-Guided, Controlled Events Based on Epigenetic Regulation

Gene duplication is not a random process. Emerging research indicates that gene duplications are orchestrated events heavily influenced by RNA-guided mechanisms and epigenetic regulation. Epigenetics, the study of heritable changes in gene expression that do not involve changes to the underlying DNA sequence, plays a crucial role in controlling gene activity. RNA molecules, including small interfering RNAs and microRNAs, are instrumental in guiding these epigenetic changes, ensuring that gene duplication events occur in a regulated manner. This controlled duplication process suggests a level of precision and purpose inconsistent with the randomness proposed by evolutionary theory.

Gene Duplications Do Not Increase the Amount of Biological Information in the Cell

A common misconception is that gene duplications increase the amount of biological information within a cell. However, duplication merely creates an additional copy of existing genetic material without introducing new information. This can be compared to copying a book; while the number of books increases, the content remains unchanged. The duplicated genes, therefore, do not introduce novel functionalities or information but rather replicate the existing genetic code.

Gene Duplication Often Leads to Gene Loss or Other Forms of Information Loss

In post-duplication, genes are subject to various environmental pressures and constraints. It is often observed that one of the duplicated genes accumulates harmful mutations at a faster rate due to missing epigenetic markers to maintain both copies. This can lead to the eventual loss of the duplicated gene or its transformation into a non-functional pseudogene. Additionally, after DNA rearrangement duplicated genes may undergo subfunctionalization, where the original function is divided between the two copies, or neofunctionalization, where one copy acquires a new function. However, these processes frequently result in a net loss of genetic information, as the original gene's integrity and functionality can be compromised.

Epigenetic Regulation and Neofunctionalization

The process of neofunctionalization, where one copy of a duplicated gene acquires a new function, is often cited as a pathway for evolutionary innovation. However, detailed studies reveal that epigenetic regulation plays a significant role in this process, often acting as a constraint rather than a facilitator of novel function. According to recent research published in Science Advances, epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA methylation and histone modification, tightly regulate gene expression in duplicated genes. These modifications can lead to the silencing of one gene copy, preventing it from acquiring new functions independently. Moreover, the RNA-directed DNA methylation pathway ensures that epigenetic marks are faithfully passed on during cell division, maintaining the original gene's expression pattern and limiting the potential for neofunctionalization. This regulation underscores the complexity and precision of genetic control mechanisms, which appear designed to preserve genetic integrity rather than promote random evolutionary changes.

Gene Duplications Do Not Lead to Evolution

The evolutionary paradigm posits that gene duplications provide raw material for the evolution of new functions and increased complexity. Yet, the reality observed in genetic studies does not support this. Gene duplications, while contributing to genetic variation, do not inherently drive the creation of new, beneficial functions that lead to increased organismal complexity. Instead, they often result in redundancy, loss of function, or neutral changes that do not contribute to evolutionary advancement. The lack of evidence for novel, beneficial traits arising solely from gene duplications challenges the notion that this mechanism is a significant driver of evolution.

In conclusion, gene duplications, when understood through the framework of intelligent design, reveal a process that is controlled, non-random, and largely conservative in terms of biological information. These duplications, guided by RNA and regulated epigenetically, do not support the evolutionary claims of increased complexity and novel function. Instead, they point towards an inherent design and regulation mechanism within organisms, reinforcing the idea of an intelligent designer behind life's complexity.

Summary and conclusions:

  • Gene duplications are not random processes. They are epigenetically controlled cellular events designed for adaptational purposes.
  • After a gene duplication event there's a significant loss of DNA in the cell. This is because cellular mechanisms rearrange DNA to serve as organized information for producing RNA molecules.
  • These procedures emphasize the passive role of DNA as information storage.
  • Gene duplications point to Design and Creation.


References

  1. Brosius, J. (2003). "Gene Duplication and Other Evolutionary Strategies: Role of RNA."
  2. Qiu, J. (2006). "Epigenetics: Unfinished Symphony." Nature.
  3. Hughes, A. L. (1994). "The Evolution of Functionally Novel Proteins after Gene Duplication." Proceedings of the Royal Society B.
  4. Zhang, J. (2003). "Evolution by Gene Duplication: An Update." Trends in Ecology & Evolution.
  5. Lynch, M., & Conery, J. S. (2000). "The Evolutionary Fate and Consequences of Duplicate Genes." Science.
  6. Long, M., & Thornton, K. (2001). "Gene Duplication and Evolution." Science.
  7. Force, A., Lynch, M., Pickett, F. B., Amores, A., Yan, Y. L., & Postlethwait, J. (1999). "Preservation of Duplicate Genes by Complementary, Degenerative Mutations." Genetics.
  8. Hahn, M. W. (2009). "Distinguishing Among Evolutionary Models for the Maintenance of Gene Duplicates." Journal of Heredity.
  9. https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/5/7/eaaw7006