Evolution Is Not a Creative Force but a Destructive Process – How Genomic Function and Mutation Load Refute Evolution
Introduction
According to classical evolutionary theory, random mutations and natural selection together form the engine that drives biological development from simple lifeforms to complex organisms. However, recent discoveries in genomics have begun to seriously challenge this framework. New data on the functional extent of the human genome and the relentless accumulation of mutations suggest that evolution, far from being a creative force, is actually a destructive, degenerative process.
This article explores the incompatibility of evolution with observed mutation rates, and the implications of the fact that most of the human genome is actively transcribed and functionally important. We conclude with a realistic estimate of how many generations remain before human reproduction becomes biologically impossible – all within the context of a biblical timeline that includes creation and the genetic bottleneck after the global Flood.
Genomic Function: Transcription Across the Genome
Until the early 2000s, much of the human genome was thought to be "junk DNA" – inactive sequences that had accumulated through random evolutionary processes. This belief provided a convenient cushion for evolution, as mutations in "junk" regions were assumed to be harmless.
However, large-scale projects such as ENCODE (2012) and subsequent transcriptomic studies radically altered that view:
“More than 90% of the human genome is likely to be transcribed, yielding a complex network of overlapping transcripts that include tens of thousands of long RNAs with little or no protein-forming capacity.”
(Kung et al., 2013; ENCODE Consortium, 2012)
This means the human genome is not passive or mostly irrelevant, but highly active and full of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) that regulate gene expression, chromatin structure, development, stress responses, and more. These findings greatly expand the concept of functionality, calling into question the very assumptions evolution depends on.
Mutation Load: The Genome Cannot Tolerate Full Functionality
Mutation load refers to the accumulation of deleterious mutations in a population over generations. Modern studies estimate that each human inherits about 60–100 new mutations per generation (Kondrashov, 2003). If only 5–10% of the genome is functional, most of these mutations may be harmless. But if 90–100% is functional, as current data indicate, most mutations will be harmful to some degree.
This reality has been explored in depth by John Sanford, a former genetics professor at Cornell University, in his book Genetic Entropy:
"Natural selection cannot effectively eliminate slightly harmful mutations, so they inevitably accumulate. This leads to degeneration, not evolution."
The critical point:
-
Natural selection is powerless against the vast majority of slightly deleterious mutations (Kimura & Crow, 1970).
-
If the genome is almost entirely functional, mutation burden rapidly exceeds what a population can endure.
Even leading evolutionary biologist Dan Graur admitted:
“If 80% of the genome is functional, then evolution is wrong.”
(Graur et al., 2013)
The Accelerating Pace of Genetic Degeneration
Genetic decay does not proceed at a constant rate. Several factors make degeneration exponential over time:
-
Mutations in DNA repair genes reduce the cell’s ability to correct future errors.
-
Disruption of epigenetic control leads to faulty gene expression and cellular dysfunction.
-
Compounding of mutational load increases vulnerability in every generation.
As these faults accumulate, mutations begin to target essential systems such as fertility, immunity, and development, pushing the population closer to a crisis point.
The Biblical Timeline and the Final Countdown
Let’s consider the human timeline from a young-earth creationist perspective:
-
Creation occurred ~6000 years ago
-
The global Flood occurred ~4500 years ago, resulting in a severe genetic bottleneck (only three sons of Noah contributed to the modern gene pool)
-
Assuming ~25 years per generation, we are ~180 generations past the Flood.
Sanford’s genetic entropy model estimates that a human population cannot remain genetically viable for more than ~250–300 generations under current mutation rates, especially without the ability to remove slightly deleterious mutations.
➤ This implies that we are approaching a biological tipping point:
🔚 Humanity may reach critical degeneration within 70–120 more generations (i.e., in the next 500–1000 years), depending on environmental stressors and the use of artificial technologies (e.g., gene therapy, IVF) to maintain fertility.
Conclusion: Evolution Is a Self-Defeating Process
In summary:
-
The vast majority of the genome is functionally transcribed and regulated, not inert.
-
Mutations accumulate relentlessly, and most are mildly harmful, especially when the genome is highly functional.
-
Natural selection lacks the precision and efficiency to eliminate such mutations.
-
Genetic degeneration is accelerating, especially as it damages systems responsible for maintaining genomic integrity.
Together, these facts refute the evolutionary model, which requires vast amounts of time, neutral DNA, and an unlimited tolerance for mutation. Instead, they strongly support the view that the human genome was originally created perfect, but is now decaying under the curse of sin, as described in Scripture.
Evolution, when viewed through the lens of modern genetics, is not a process of improvement, but a one-way path to biological extinction. And according to the data, that extinction is not millions of years away – it may be within the visible horizon of human history.
References
-
ENCODE Project Consortium. (2012). An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature, 489, 57–74.
-
Kung, J. T. Y., Colognori, D., & Lee, J. T. (2013). Noncoding RNAs: Biological functions and applications. Epigenetics & Chromatin, 6(1).
-
Sanford, J. (2014). Genetic Entropy & the Mystery of the Genome. FMS Publications.
-
Kimura, M., & Crow, J. F. (1970). The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics, 49(4), 725–738.
-
Kondrashov, A. S. (2003). Direct estimates of human per nucleotide mutation rates at 20 loci causing Mendelian diseases. Human Mutation, 21(1), 12–27.
-
Graur, D., Zheng, Y., Price, N., Azevedo, R. B. R., Zufall, R. A., & Elhaik, E. (2013). On the immortality of television sets: “Function” in the human genome according to the evolution-free gospel of ENCODE. Genome Biology and Evolution, 5(3), 578–590.